Friday, September 13, 2019
A Civil Rebuttal
 A Civil Rebuttal Essay  A Civil Rebuttal Essay        Philosophy  a:pursuit of wisdom. b:a search for a general  understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative rather than  observational means.  Through this most specific definition given to us respectively by Sir  Websters dictionary, I choose in my best interest to refrain to you just what  the meaning of philosophy is. I implore you to try and comprehend this matter  in what exactly this word brought abrupt to us is about. The word philosophy  has two definitive definitions.         The first simply means to pursue, or strive for,  wisdom. I beg to differ in the understanding of the fault I make in trying to  gain this unprecedented knowledge. The knowledge that we as a unity try to  strive for have made us, again as a unity, divides. I asked myself exactly how  we have achieved civilized chaos in the search for our solutions and  resolutions of the very virus it seems we have caused. I would not of course  go so far as to say a civil war between the generations within this house, but  moreover to express that simply by me using philosophy, it becomes not only my  benefit, but a mutualism between us.  Please feel more than obliged to correct me if I am incorrect (morally  or politically) but are we not all philosophers ourselves? As a bakers  vocation is to bake, a philosophers vocation is to think.   Is it not that we  all think? I was deeply saddened at your comments in the oppression and  restriction to what I may or may not strive to think. As a pacifist and non-  sadist, I call what you believe in as ingraining or indoctrination, whereas  our own society may call it brainwashing.  Our human nature gives us freedom,  as does the Constitution. It guarantees us the right to life, liberty, and the  pursuit of happiness. Within the refines of this home, I find it a task to see  those liberties granted. Here is a few of the worlds greatest oppressors: Jim  Jones, Adolph Hitler, Napoleon Bonaparte, Julius Caesar, David Koresh, and Anton  Szandor LaVey.   I know, as well as you, that these notorious six are among the  worlds most hated. However here are a few oppressors from another standpoint:  Sigmund Freud, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus Christ, Mahatma Ghandi, and  Siddharta Guatama the Buddha. These are the exact opposite of the previously  mentioned, who put an oppression into a good morality. Its not about who uses  the gift, its the entirety of the users ethics.    The second definition of the word philosophy aptly states that it is the  desire to learn more through speculation rather than observation. Without  speculation, we as a planet would be at loss. There would never have been  discoveries of planets, medicinal uses, genetic finds, and behavioral studies.  Lets face it, without philosophy, we would still get leeched at the doctors for  the common cold. These fine discoveries were all made by philosophers. Now  these philosophers were brave enough to challenge science, the government, and  even the Church.   Now, I am not one to stand here and say that I will believe in  unholy blasphemy, but rather I feel I should receive the liberty to speak freely  as long as I hold myself in a civil and adult manner.  In conclusion to this essay, I must tell you that this in itself is my  philosophy. I believe it was the great reformist Voltaire who says, I do not  agree with a single word you say, but will fight to the death your right to say  it. In some respects, I feel non-indifferent to his theory. So I beseech you  to help yourselves as well as others in this house to let me speak freely of my  philosophy, for the word is simply a synonym to the word think. The famous  quote, I think, therefore I am.    Furthermore, if we do not philosophize, we do not think. Scholars have made it  known that the only relics of others are within their philosophy. For instance,  GOD, Elshadai, or Adanai, is known exclusively through his philosophies. The  Bible refers to creation as, . .   . and GOD saw it was good. . . GOD  philosophized that things were good. I know you cannot disagree with me on this  reasoning, for you would be one to doubt GOD.   I am trying my best to not make  this about theology, but to simply keep it within one field. In short: the only  people that choose .    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.